From: Subject: Re: Jim Date: Sunday, March 09, 2008 6:13 PM On Mar 10, 6:36 am, Hasl...@aol.com wrote: > > It's that simple...the Baha'I Defender gets to publicly determine and > > delineate my relationship to my faith and tell me and the world if I'm > > for it or "against it"! > > Personally, Rod, I think your posts speak for themselves. Well 'Duh'! My posts consistently "speak for themselves" in their clear and open opposition to the use of lie, slander and false allegation by Baha'is to demean, defame and demonise other/or ex Baha'is. My posts "speak for themselves" in opposition to such lie and slander wether it be open and overt or conducted through thinly veiled inference and innuendo. This opposition to the prevalence of lie and slander is taken to be "drawing a line" standing on "the other side" and setting myself "against the Baha'i world" The clown following you who suggests I "could disagree" with the slander is on archival record for having publicly accused me of "Hatred of all things Baha'i" for having disagreed with the slander. "Personally, Rod, I think your posts speak for themselves."?......Personally, Defender, I think your post speaks with all the usual innuendo and inference....but never the courage/ethics to speak openly and directly to the issues raised.